Batman V Superman furthers a franchise, but didnt Superman deserve a second solo movie?
Supermans adoptive father, Jonathan Kent, controversially suggests that Superman shouldnt use his powers at all.
You have to keep this side of yourself a secret, Kent tells the 13-year-old Clark.
Unsure how to go forward.
Clearly, its not easy.
Every step we take, theres land mines everywhere.
Man Of Steelsees Superman asking questions that could be levelled at America in the 21st century.
What does it mean to have such a huge amount of power?
How can it be wielded responsibly?
Its no coincidence that the religious imagery typical ofSupermanmovies is joined by military symbolism.
Kryptons ships, outfits, and artwork all recall fascist posters and statues of the 20th century.
If hes to become a force for good, Superman must first decide what being good actually means.
With all this to sort out, its little surprise that Superman himself wound up taking a back seat.
What might have happened?
Of course, theres lots more to be added in a story like this.
Dont write in).
Maybe the screenwriters could have introduced Toyman, or Mister Mxyzptlk, or Cyborg Superman.
Had Warner done this, the events ofBatman v Supermanmight have carried more dramatic weight.
Its not just Superman who was robbed of a proper arc byBatman v Superman,either.
Had Warner taken the same approach with Nolan, we never would have hadThe Dark Knight.
